Thursday, September 15, 2005

Japs and Serbs

Does anyone call the Japanese racist? Or, more specifically, is calling Japan racist normative? The answer to the second question is no just as the first question is meaningless – does “anyone” not do anything? The Japanese are a very race conscious nation. You cannot become a citizen unless you are genetically Japanese. Japan is considered a liberal and enlightened “western” nation. Yet one of the contemporary characteristics of an enlightened western nation is racelessness. Why this is so is a good question but please accept for now that it is. Almost every other nation in the lineup of the enlightened first world has embraced multiculturalism, not just in word but in deed. As best I can tell every country dogmatically multiculturalistic has a (still) White/European majority population. Every country that is not MC is non-white. One of the few White countries that in recent memory made any modest efforts to reverse this course is Austria which a few years ago, through democratic elections, chose a political party that, at least rhetorically, was not as committed to MC as is commonplace in the West. Whereas the enlightened, liberal Japanese have a much more nativist, racially-conscious and self preserving system in place than anything the Austrians have initiated it is the Austrians who were severely rebuked by the West’s ideological torch bearers – not Japan.

Why?

Why are White countries, all of them, expected to be multicultural and not non-white countries, even among the supposedly enlightened? By the standards of liberalism it is arguable that a country like Chad be exempted from “progressive” anti-majority policies, since it is very poor, and the poor are usually held to a different standard in the egalitarian mindset (at least if they are the right type of poor) than the rich. Of course the poverty of Serbia didn’t stop the enlightened from bombing her into line for daring to defy MC. Serbia was defying the takeover of its historic lands by Albanian Muslims and international jihadists and the world community would not allow this since Muslims are on the approved list of people who can be self-preserving and Whites are not. What would be a dilemma for the Jews, along the lines of free pork, is if more and more Whites become Muslim. Will their Christian hatred or their White hatred win out? I think the answer is obvious.

So Japan is exempted though a prosperous first world country. Austria is not exempted though it is also a first world country (though not nearly as prosperous as Japan). Chad is exempted since it is very poor but not Serbia which is also poor. Other very rich and MC-exempt countries include Saudi Arabia and the other Persian Gulf states.

What is the common thread here? It is clear that White racial identity and nationalism is not considered legitimate while for every other race it is. Though many would argue that Nazi Germany should hold a distinct place in our memories this raises two questions. One, why are the white nations that defeated Nazism not exempted from the current anti-white bias? Unless these White nations shed their blood and treasure to defeat Germany in two world wars there would be no anti-white paradigm at all. So the free White countries that ended a menace, less to themselves than to other races, are now being treated like trash. Charles Lindbergh warned of this in 1941 and history is proving him right even though he was and is being vilified for saying so. Two, why are Japanese racial atrocities virtually ignored, at least in comparison to the Holocaust? Especially in regards to the Chinese, Japan was ruthless and this barbarity had a clear racial element.

On a related note, the Soviets were clearly genocidal to many of their classes and ethnicities, notably the Ukranians. If the Soviets were notably ethnic Russians then I have little doubt their crimes would be a much greater part of our collective memories. But since the soviet leadership was a racial polyglot (though disproportionately ethnic Jews) and their victims mostly White they have largely been given a pass.

I just gave a hint as to what I think is a compelling answer to the original question of “why?” Japan, as with all other non-white countries and people groups, is exempted from multiculturalism because they are not considered corporately responsible for transgressions against Jews. Even though Whites fought against Whites to, among other things, save the Jews to the point of tens of millions of deaths of our best young men, Whites are now considered illegitimate as a race. As the black writer Shelby Steele recently commented in defense of this double standard:

"No group in recent history has more aggressively seized power in the name of its racial superiority than Western whites. This race illustrated for all time—through colonialism, slavery, white racism, Nazism—the extraordinary human evil that follows when great power is joined to an atavistic sense of superiority and destiny. This is why today's whites, the world over, cannot openly have a racial identity."

In other words, Whites are uniquely evil compared to the supposedly more moral and less dangerous non-whites. He argues this in parallel with justifying non-white racial consciousness. Shelby Steele is considered very mainstream and his reasoning here is orthodox according to polite society. He will not be shouted down or boycotted or otherwise made into a pariah. To reverse some of these words and replace white with black or brown is considered in bad taste to even think much less speak.

We are called racist when we want to restrict who we allow in our countries. We are called racist when we demand that our governments confiscate less of our money for the purpose of domestic and international interracial wealth transfers. We are ridiculed for standing up to the anti-natal, culture destroying movements of radical feminism and homosexual rights.

Now all of these movements that are deliberately destroying the White race have an unmistakable level of Jewish intellectual leadership. Many argue that Jews are White and they are, when it suits them, just like they are non-white when that suits them. Does anyone suspect that the disproportionate representation of Jews in college admissions and in cultural leadership positions will be hindered by affirmative action? No, since at those times Jews will wear the mantle of minority victim of white, gentile persecution. Yet when it comes to selling things to the public as politicians, CEO’s, and actors Jews will turn as white as snow. Gentile Whites will lose either way. We will be squeezed out between Jews and the preferred minority groups when diversity reigns supreme. We will be hindered by our people’s demonization, leading to no sense of self, when merit reigns.

Wealth, religion, and language mean nothing in the paradigm of political correctness. Everything is subordinated to the goal of destroying the White Race. When will a critical mass of Whites see this and start working to save themselves? If we won’t do it no one else will. We are expected to save the world as our posterity is swept away. What would P.T. Barnum call someone who fell for that deal?

2 comments:

S. Jozef Tramani said...

I disagree with your racial demagoguery, but wanted to comment on the following:

"By the standards of liberalism it is arguable that a country like Chad be exempted from “progressive” anti-majority policies, since it is very poor, and the poor are usually held to a different standard in the egalitarian mindset (at least if they are the right type of poor) than the rich."

That's because widespread poverty is the goal of the egalitarian mindset.

Human well being and advancment is not the cause of the liberal.

wjg said...

"That's because widespread poverty is the goal of the egalitarian mindset."

I'm in agreement with this but you don't acknowledge that there may be multiple objectives of the Establishment. How do you think a new world of "free" trade, open borders, and soaring "profits" is to be achieved? Nations must be destroyed; especially the most independent and prosperous. Unless you shed the religion of liberalism, you clearly are still under the sway of, you can never even consider the link of race/genetics to nationhood. Even considering this is heresy to our modern inquisitions.

If you want more explanations please ask. If you want to use terms like "racial demagoguery", then please return to the mainstream forums where everyone sings from the same anti-white/marxist-pc hymnals.

Whites who want their people to survive are "racists" - but no one else is. Think about this.