Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Are you a racist?

If you are a white person who actually cares about your ancestors, yourself, and children you had better be. The contemporary definition of "racist" in the United States and in Europe is any white person who favors their own group and acts to protect it. You don’t even have to hate other groups to be a racist. You can even, like most, hold no antipathy towards other groups at all; but that is not good enough for the high priests of multi-culturalism. Unless you feel no loyalty to your group you are a racist. So the choice is yours: either love and prefer your people and be labeled a racist or shun them and be allowed into the enlightened presence of the gatekeepers of acceptability.

For a long time I cringed at hearing the label but since I have come to realize what being an anti-racist is; a hater of kith and kin, an arrogant ingrate who despises his ancestors and what they created and suffered to protect, a nowhere man whose identity is shaped by others; I now no longer flee the label. Yes, it is unfair in the sense of both semantics and consistency but the alternative is far worse. Semantically it is unfair because it connotes something that is untrue. The average person equates racist with hatred, even violence towards others, which is usually not the case among Whites who want to protect White culture. Anytime a word means something on the visceral, emotional level that is entirely inconsistent with reality it is being used to distort instead of inform. Also this label is not used consistently by those who apply it. That was why I previously made it clear that white people are most affected by this. The label is applied by the news media, by the entertainment industry, by the educational establishment, by the political process, by government, by religions, by the business world, by just about every cultural institution in a one sided fashion. The label is almost exclusively applied to Whites in a way that, following the Establishment’s own definition, makes them anti-White racists. As an anecdote consider the contrasts of Al Sharpton and David Duke. I do this with an apology in advance to Mr. Duke, who though I have never met him, consider him fair minded, intelligent and brave from what I have seen available to the public. It is fair to call them both racial activists, Sharpton for Blacks and Duke for Whites, but look at how they are presented to the public by our cultural gatekeepers. Sharpton is occasionally criticized for being a demagogue but he was treated like a king by all the white politicians in the Democratic Party who were competing against him for the 2004 presidential nomination. Keep in mind Sharpton’s role in both the Tawana Brawley interracial rape hoax and the Freddie’s Fashion Mart arson/murder. This guy has made a living with unsubstantiated racially charged accusations that have directly led to murder and yet there he is a respected leader, in the estimation of our mainstream culture, of the black community. David Duke, on the other hand, has taken on the thankless job of defending White people’s interests. I am not aware of anything he has done that comes close to the mindless demagoguery of Sharpton but he is treated like the worst kind of villain. Read his book 'My Awakening' and see if you see hate in there. Yes, it is "racist" by the definition I led with but that definition is flawed and ahistorical so it is destructive of Whites as a group and as individuals. Duke has committed one of the unpardonable thought crimes of modern life, white racial awareness and a call to action. Add to it that Duke has called into question the role of Jews in the continued destruction of American society and the denunciation is irreversible. Sharpton ‘only’ rants and raves in a completely irrational fashion to extort wealth and create white self-hate and self-doubt, leading to occasional murder by mobs. He plays Stepandfetchit to his Establishment masters who want Whites continually on the defensive. He does a good job which is why the Establishment tolerates him. One is a player the other a pariah. I’ll take the pariah.

Now there is the chance that the love of your own people can lead to a hatred of others but that risk, I believe, is even greater when we are hamstrung into the deceitful ideology of anti-racism/multiculturalism. Man is tribal, for better or worse, and no trendy philosophy can change this regardless of how much it is propagandized, extorted, preached, and coerced into our minds. As a matter of fact the more energetically anti-racism is force fed to us the more rebellion there will be as people are finally forced to the surface to breathe the clean air of the truth.

A love and preference for those that are closest to you is a threat to the New World Order we are currently plunging into but far from leading to a hatred of others it allows for a respect for them since most people make some effort to apply the golden rule. We are all wired to treat others as we would like to be treated even though we often violate this principle.

If you are white and want to throw off the shackles that have been placed on you and your people a good place to start is to no longer run from the Establishment label of "racist", ignoring, for now, the distortions of the term. Not only will you begin to love your own better but, not surprisingly, others as well. The ones to despise are the great nation destroying amalgamators. The political arm of this movement dominates both the Republican (neoconservative) and Democratic (left liberal) Parties. Wall Street and Hollywood also march arm in arm on this. The whole Establishment of America is a great wheel attempting to crush all resistance to it. They preach the freedom of unity and togetherness, free-trade and democracy, when all distinctions, variety, and flavor that make life rich will be grist for their mill of ‘progress’. Remember who the real haters are.

Be counter-cultural; look after your folk. The dead can bury their own.


Randall Gerard said...


Great post, friend. By the way, I appreciate your support over at Farmer Buie's.

I can't say I know anything at all about Mr. Duke, except what the dominant media says. I'm learning to believe the opposite of what the media says, it's usually closer to the truth. But I digress. Is Mr. Duke a christian?

wjg said...


Hopefully I'm not getting back to you too late here. I need to figure how to set my blog to be notified when anyone posts here.

First off, thanks. You did a good job at Farmer Buie's site. He seems too willing to surrender to anti-racists who in my mind are better classified as anti-white racists. Us defending ourselves is just unacceptable to them.

Regarding Duke. I am not sure if he is a Christian. He hints at it but I don't recall him coming out and saying so. I really enjoyed his book "My Awakening"; it is very well written, thought provoking, and eye opening. More white folks need to read it.

He gets into evolution a lot which can be problematic for Christians depending on what type of evolution we are talking about - macro or micro.

The only White Christians who would have a problem with Duke are 1) ones who are Judeo-Christians who think the Jews are God's chosen people and should not be crossed under any circumstances, 2) anti-racist/multiculturalists (those who think race is only skin deep - therefore the White Race is not worth protecting), or 3) terrified of being outside the mainstream; being called names, etc.

Of course adding 1, 2, and 3 probably makes up 90% of White Christians.

BTW, I like your blog. I really want to start more posting on farming since I think getting unplugged from our exploitive economy is essential to Godly living but I keep getting distracted by Whites surrendering on all fronts. Where is the spirit of our people?

ploughman said...

As a racialist [ie someone who is not ashamed of his ancestors]
I'd just like to say well written.
The Dark Ages are upon us it seems.
Nations reverting back to tribes and tribes back to families.At least the value of blood kin is being re-awakened.
God Bless