Wherever You Turn

Before pitching it in our fireplace, to at least do some good, I made a note of an interesting snippet out of the Wall Street Journal. A realtor from Arkansas forwarded some property listings along with some other material praising that region as a great place to live. The photocopy of the WSJ article (written by Jeff Opdyke) had many nice things to say about the area and then it lowered the boom – THERE IS NOT ENOUGH DIVERSITY IN THE REGION. Translation – “There are too many Whites around. What must be done to solve this problem?” It cited a statistic that ‘only’ 1.9% of the population is non-white. I know things are crazy regarding multiculturalism and the anti-white hatred that masquerades as anti-racism. I further know that the WSJ is pure neocon (Jews who used to be Marxist until the US out-bid Stalin for their support), money-worshipping rag, but what the hell does lack of “diversity” have to do with an article on real estate? For any sane person isn’t the opposite true; that the LESS diverse an area is the better?

Is everything now being done in code? Was the article’s backhand against Whites really the only PC way to get the news across? ‘Wink, wink, “We know we shouldn’t be saying this but there are very few colored peoples in this area but we can only say it by making it sound like a bad thing”, giggle’. Doubtful, since the WSJ wants to demonize whiteness the same way all organized Jewry does. Orthodox/Reformed/Atheist, Left/Right, Republican/Democratic; they all agree on that. They would have only said the lack of ‘diversity’ was a bad thing because they meant it. Still, maybe the Goyim aren’t as dumb as we seem and we are using the Chosen People’s propaganda to stay informed, regardless of their sinister intentions. Again, doubtful. The Goyim have largely been beaten down and only see what they are supposed to see and say what they are supposed to say. We seem to have no fight left. That tidbit was there and its brazen inclusion is evidence of our own humiliation and defeat. We must now avert our gaze and accept our disenfranchisement from that which our forefathers built. “Who’re you looking at BOY?” they ask and we look down.

When the assertion was made that the number of Whites was too high and other, preferred, races too low I don’t recall seeing any argument as to why this is a bad thing. As silly as the justifications always are, at least when they are attempted there is some facade of rationality but we are in the age of fundamentalist anti-white hatred. Statements such as these are now just made like mantras – a Rosary for the slaves of the Master Race as we kiss their ring. Is it really now this Pavlovian - this repetition of platitudes without critical reflection? It amazes me the way the average modern looks down at medieval folks as superstitious when we have it over them in spades (pun intended) in that area. We regularly nod our heads in agreement at the most ludicrous, counter-intuitive and surreal declarations of bogus morality and think we are progressive. Bloodletting was less bad for us than Jewry’s philosophies, and was not built on malice.

If white-hating propaganda now shows up during a search for a home, what’s next – the weather report?