Mel Gibson meet Marlon Brando

I happened to get a copy of the Washington Compost yesterday and scanned thru it to see if there was anything worth reading an voila; there was a short story about Mel Gibson getting arrested for drunk driving and having a tirade against Jewry. Granted he was intoxicated and his guard was let down but it was refreshing to see a public figure allow some air into the stagnant public forum. Of course the Compost is run by Jews for Jews so it attacked his anti-semitism and pounded its chest in vindication for its doubted characterization of him in the buildup to the release of The Passion. The Compost even reminded its lobotomizsed Goy readership and its Chosenites how Gibson did not prostrate himself before the Holocaust but instead only said that Jewry was one group among many that suffered in WWII. Gouge out his eyes and cut out his tongue, the uppity dog!

The sad, though expected thing, is that the story didn’t end with Gibson’s defiance of Jewry but his prostration to it, “deeply regretting” his remarks and attributing his tirade to his struggle with alcohol. It’s hard to blame him for not really being a William Wallace in our time. Even the real William Wallace doesn’t compare to the fake one. The same thing happened to Marlon Brando a few years ago. He went so far to grovel and cry at the feet of the blessed and perfect Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League – begging for forgiveness and redemption from an anointed one. Gibson has not done that yet (it’s still too early) but expect Jewry to demand it.

Public figures in the last 100 years who have defied the Master Race have not fared well. Jewry knows how to make an example of uppity Whites, either individuals (Charles Linbergh, Henry Ford, etc.) or nations (Russia and Germany). I see no way in the next few generations Whites will cast off this parasite from our presence. I have spoken to enough “average” Americans (inside my family and out) who will hear of many things but not an attack on the Chosen Ones. Not that I expect average folks to do anything contrary to that which they have been conditioned to believe; it is for them too deep, too emotional, too dear. They are, in some sort of strange reverse projection “Jews” even as real Jews despise them. Judeoxtian-holocaustianity is at their core now. Mention Jewry as our enemy and the fists fly up in defense – “But not ALL Jews are against us. It is not right to generalize”. When I reply that they have attacked us AS A GROUP and we must respond in kind all I hear is, “it is not right to stereotype.”

This is another effect of judeoxtianity – niceness. Jews never fail to remind us how Christ turned the other cheek so good little xtians must do likewise “to make certain that their chaste minds are insulated against a wicked temptation not to love their enemies”- to quote Revilo Pendleton Oliver on a similar subject. Hollywood, the MSM, and Academia have demonized Whites AS A GROUP my whole life yet we are expected to defy them person by person. Jewry IS collectively guilty of crimes against the White Race in our own homelands for centuries but especially in the last 100 years. Why? Because every substantial political movement disproportionately influenced by or run by Jews has acted against us. I didn’t finally wake up to this fact until just recently.

Another thing I have heard by the conditioned masses is “but you don’t deny The Holocaust (TM), do you?” I now reply truthfully that I don’t know. This is usually met with dismay. I explain that I have become very skeptical of the claims of Jewry, and that since this is now considered the greatest heresy in any public discussion (to the point of imprisonment) it raises red flags in my mind as to its truthfulness. Why ban evaluation of this subject unless the assertions are dubious? What about freedom of speech that Jews claim to love so much? When I follow up with a question of why did the Germans perpetrate “the holocaust” more dismay follows. “Of course it’s because Hitler wanted a scapegoat. Jews did nothing wrong.” Lastly I ask why is the persecution of European Jewry at the center of our consciousness instead of the holocaust (not trademarked) of White Christian Ukrainians by Jewish Bolshevism? Most of the folks I talk to don’t say “tell me more”, they say – in effect – “shut up”. As long as it took me to see the light on this issue I think I would have been very open to hearing “me” several years ago. But most are not.

We have an alien race, an alien religion, and an alien consciousness grafted into our psyche’s all to serve the alien’s malignant purposes; notably their ascension and our destruction. Rather than confront this life and death struggle head on our more intelligent people are directed to think harmless, even counterproductive, nonsense like the gummint blew up the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, Islam is “our” greatest enemy, Israel is a wondrous friend, and modern America is worth defending. The length of “acceptable” subjects for our people to devote their political energies on is only exceeded by their meaninglessness. Likewise the few meaningful ones are spoken about even less than the emperor having no clothes.

I hope Gibson defies our masters but I don’t blame him for not doing so; he has a family to support. But I pray he doesn’t grovel either, even as many of the judeoxtians who flocked to The Passion turn on him. Betrayal by friends and family has got to be the worst thing a man can face and that would be Gibson’s fate. If he proves not to be a martyr I have no complaint. I already know I am not.

P.S. Seeing the cover of the JewSA Today this morning is a fitting exclamation point. Right under the perfunctory attack headline on Gibson, directing the lemmings back to the Lifestyle section to get taught what happens to bad anti-semites, was a picture of several Lebanese children dead from an Israeli bomb. I doubt that was an attempt at irony.

Circle the wagons or roll out the red carpet?

As White Nationalists scattered around the world we are bound very loosely by blood and by a desire to save our people. We are not yet a power that our enemy has to take seriously since our numbers are few and we have little power or influence. Still, the enemy occasionally bites us, whether as a test or as a sincere effort to hurt us is unclear. At those times our unity, or lack thereof, is displayed.

Recently I came across a tidbit buried in a discussion thread at Majority Rights that brought this home. Someone posted, within the thread, an article about how White “Supremacist” groups (90% of the time the label is a lie; Separatist being much more accurate) were being infiltrated and undermined. The only thing referenced was the arrest of Shaun Walker and a compatriot of his/ours affiliated with National Alliance. Shaun Walker was the Chairman of that group until then and his offense was supposedly beating up one of the Chosenites’ pets. It is much more probable that this was a bar fight that happened spontaneously (as has been claimed) but when you are White and you have a run in with a person of color and especially if you are an avowed white separatist you are guilty. The Establishment (Jew) article sang the praises of this arrest since it will help root out the “hate” (uppity Whites defying our own genocide) in this pristine land of virtue and culture – the United States. That the article was full of jew-propaganda masquerading as unbiased news is no surprise.

What shocked me is that this happened June 12th and it was the first time I had heard of it. Furthermore, the tea-sipping advocate of “respectable” white nationalism who runs Majority Rights (Guessedworker), and has allowed it to be hijacked by an anti-white troll, was GLAD the arrest happened. Not glad because he expected the arrest to awaken and motivate our movement but glad because National Alliance was not as respectable as he was. NOW, he thinks the common man will flock to our cause because this blemish is removed. The flaming dimwit, who “for all his subtleties, has not wisdom”. Why will the inert “common man” come to a group that will not look after its own? The common man is smarter than that. At this point I doubt I would exert one calorie defending Guessedworker when the commissars come to take him away. Others should consider likewise since he not only would not defend us but PRAISE our incarceration.

Now I don’t visit many sites in an average day but many are pro-white and I had not heard of this news. News like that should spread like wildfire amongst all pro-white forums regardless of whether they agree with all National Alliance’s views. When one of us is attacked by our enemy we should consider it an attack on all of us.

If and until the White Nationalist movement becomes a community we will continue to invite the very abuse our enemy heaps upon us. When they come to haul one of our brothers away they should leave having paid a price for even considering it. As it is they leave with tea and crumpet stains on their shirts and the blessings of “decent” white nationalist ringing in their ears for a job well done.

The Unavoidability of the Jewish Question

The following is a series of posts made by Wintermute at The Civic Platform. The comments came in response to a post there by Daedalus who asked if the Jewish Question is really something upon which White Nationalists should spend so much energy. Daedalus’ post was very sensible and the question is worth asking by newbies to WN. Wintermute’s answer is so well done it deserves to be seen by that handful of intrepid souls who wander to this small corner of the fever swamps but missed it there.

Here is a little background for those who may be otherwise unaware. American Renaissance is an organization run by Jared Taylor and it focuses on race realism. It covers subjects resulting from race differences such as crime rates, intelligence, and culture. The focus of AmRen is the negative consequences other races have on the White Race. It does a good job as far as it goes. Until a few months ago AmRen had a fair amount of debate about the causes of the on-going fall of our people. This often turned to the Jewish Question and there are advocates of at least three main views on this:

1) Jews must be courted and are only our enemies in the same fashion as white liberals and that anti-semites need to be purged from White Nationalist groups because Jews are white (this view is characterized by the blogger Lawrence Auster - View from the Right)

2) Jews overwhelmingly have been, still are, and always will work against Whites in very destructive ways and that they have no place in any white nation much less any WN organization and that they are NOT white (characterized by the late William Pierce - founder of National Alliance)

3) Jews have largely worked against us but since they control most institutions of power we must try to avoid giving offense.

Jared Taylor used to allow this debate but he had some sort of epiphany and has opted to shut down this subject altogether so he is now an example of the third variety. There is a fourth view and it is what I call Jew worship but since these people are never White Nationalists it is purely relegated to trolls allowed into WN forums. For now AmRen can still display all the destruction the white world is facing but cannot talk about possibly the most compelling cause - Jewry. It’s like seeing the Wizard of Oz but never being able to look behind the curtain.

Here’s Wintermute:

• I agree that this is the most vexed question facing racialism at the current moment.

However, I must disagree with Daedalus when he writes, “No one will ever care about the JQ until they are convinced that white racial preservation, or ”racism,” as it is pathologized today, is a moral duty that we owe to future generations of our own people.”

“No one” is not quite accurate. I was turned, virtually overnight, from what I call a “Benetton Libertarian” to what is now deemed a “racialist” of an almost obsessive cast, by a reading of Kevin MacDonald’s book. It was obvious to me, almost instantly, that the model MacDonald presented not only accounted for observed phenomena in a more parsimonious way than current theories of the architecture of political power, but that it could be used to make very accurate predictions as well.

I will be honest, Daedalus, I cannot tell whether you are anti-Judaic (a term to be preferred to the now loaded and unusable anti-Semitic) in private, admitting to a genteel Jared Taylor racialism, or whether you are genuinely unaware of the depths of the Jewish Question. It’s not like you would be alone, even among the greatest men of our race. It is very plain in retrospect that, though he suspected the degree to which Jews direct Western life, inner and outer, that Hitler himself could not bring himself to believe the depth of the problem. So you’re cagey and keeping your options open. That’s good. I respect that, though as I have said, I disagree.

Taylor has now sold himself and his organization lock, stock, and barrel to the Jews. They will slowly arrive in small numbers, accumulate slowly (not all will admit to Jewish ancestry or loyalty), provide AmRen with access to media and respectability. Jared Taylor will be the first White Nationalist who will appear in a major Northeastern Newspaper without the epithet “far right extremist” or “neo-Nazi” listed as his official title.

Now, I have my sources concerning Mr. Taylor. I happen to know that his view of the Jewish Question, is, if anything, more alarmist and hysterical than my own. The less said about his devotion to the Third Reich, the better, though I will say he owns more paraphernalia of that regime than I do (full disclosure: I own none). Mr. Taylor, who has built the most respectable WN organization in the United States, has effectively outlawed discussion of the Jewish question, which he has already disavowed on the Donahue show and various radio programs. It’s not hard to follow his logic, since it follows yours: given that Jews are so powerful, there is simply no way to even challenge them openly and prevail.

So far as it goes, that’s not an unfair statement to make. It may yet prove to be impossible, or it may not. My take is: it hasn’t been tried yet.

However:

As the years pass, and AmRen fills with Jews like Polichinello, Michael Weiner, and so forth, I predict one of two things will happen: either the group will be directed by its Jewish wing into purposeless and vicious encounters with Blacks and Mexicans, which can be used by “non-WN” Jews, via their media cousins, to destroy the legitimacy of all Euro-American Civil Rights movements, or they will simply be marginalized and encouraged to vent their increasing rage at more and more inconsequential targets, as the Birchers were. Remember, the Jews bought them out, and directed an anti-Communist group (in the 50s!) down avenues of complete irrelevance while they were roundly mocked so well and so often in the press that they are a laughingstock, even today.

You can see how easy it would be for Jews to do this to AmRen.

Finally, consider the odds on the gamble Jared has just made with our future: for a few radio interviews, appearances on daytime TV, and columns on Horowitz FrontPage, he has turned his well assembled WN group into the new Birchers. Not only are Jews now in a position to completely neutralize or marginalize WN or any subsequent racialist movement, the sacrifice of maybe fifty activists and a few hundred million dollars (pocket change, really) will now allow them to claim far and wide that:

a) Jews are actually not monolithic, and have a variety of political positions and concerns, which they do not and, even more damaging and nightmarish, that

b) Jews are on “our” side or even worse, that they are “White”, which they are not.

The PR damage of these last two listed items, to my mind, is even more dangerous than the simple marginalization of racialist opposition to current attempts to erase culture, family, race, nation, heritage, and religion as mediating structures between the “hierarchically harmonious” civilizations that Whites create, on the one hand, and the totalitarian nightmares and chaos that seem the only expression of Jewish political action among foreign populations.

We’ve discussed this before. There are times to remain silent on the debates surrounding German internment of Jews in the Second World War. The best approach to presenting the Jewish question is a challenging question but not impossible one. The main points of Culture of Critique, after all, can be summarized as an hour long DVD which gets the message across pretty well, not to mention the fact that the Jews - and no one else - are gearing up to drive America into war with Iraq, which will be our end as financial and political power forever. Wider repercussions, such as regional wars, the use of nuclear weaponry, and other possible sequelae to Israel’s command to the United States to attack Iran, will be the milieu in which we spread our message.

As I have said before, the hour of decision is not upon us, it is drawing to a close. I do not think much is achievable for the White Race, but something might still be saved. Whatever might be saved is not going to be saved by Taylor’s new John Birch Society, anymore than immigration is going to be resisted by the Sierra Club, on account of a hundred billion dollar contribution by a Jewish billionaire, who gave them instructions to purge the group of its anti-immigration wing, which they promptly did. So the largest lobby of its kind was emasculated by one Jewish player.

What do you think will become of Jared Taylor infinitely smaller, less influential, and widely hated lobby when it has fifty Jews inside?

This is not the time for irresolution. Our Race is almost certainly doomed, on account of its own actions in accord with Jewish demands during the Second World War (there are distal causes, of course). Since annihilation is virtually assured, why not go out saying what is true?

Christ, piss ant medieval peasants would regularly give Jews the boot. Are we of so much less stature than they morally that this is beyond us? They simply assumed their problem was over once the local group of bloodsuckers was dispensed with. They had failed to understand their own interdependence with other White States, just as they had no understanding of Jewish tenacity and hate, or their capacity to act virtually as a colony organism. How could a peasant know that a people so violently expelled would move heaven and earth to get back in? It does beggar belief. However, thanks to the works of Chad Powers, Kevin MacDonald, and others, we have a greater understanding of Jewish psychology, and can avoid the mistakes and the fate of our forefathers.

Are you saying we can’t create a similar climate of opinion here? Or that we shouldn’t?

I say, with chances of victory and defeat roughly the same I would rather go down telling the truth than lying. However, I keep in mind the Greco-Roman dictum that we may lie in two cases: to enemies, in order to elude them, and to the sick, feeble minded, and others of reduced capacity, to prevent them from harming themselves or others.

Obviously, we need to think more clearly how best to frame this question. However, I do not regard it as a debatable fact that Jews are now, and have always been, on a wartime footing with whomever they live among - back to Roman times - and that unless we engage them on the same grounds, we will lose.

Comment by wintermute — July 4, 2006 #


• One more point about Jared Taylor’s wager - Taylor is not a fool or a knave and I do not wish to indicate that he is.

What I want for readers here to consider is this: Taylor is betting the farm on the fact that ‘awakening’ whites to Mexicans and Blacks will eventually lead to an understanding of the Jewish Question, even though he has just made it plain that there will be no open discussion of the latter.

He’s using a Trojan Horse strategy: get Jews to foot the bill to educate Whites to their own best interests, and then watch as those ever politically clever Whites put two and two together, and turn on their ‘benefactors’. It’s a fair bet, and if we were dealing with anyone else but Jews, it might work.

My viewpoint is different: the White Man is such a politically retarded beast that he won’t even think about group interests until the electrodes are already on his genitals, if you’ll pardon my French. The Germans did seem to get the point - finally - when they had been reduced to abject poverty, debt slavery, and with a Jew controlled Empire waiting to swallow them up and murder their upper classes. But of course, those are the Germans, the best of us. There’s no guarantee regarding the rest of the branches of our racial family as to proactivity in this regard. Germany itself is now a lobotomized corpse, from which we cannot again expect help, or anything at all for that matter. They were well and truly murdered by the British and the Americans.

The Jews are betting that they can infiltrate, manipulate, and neutralize the largest and best WN organization in the US, and make it serve Jewish goals. My money is on them - they’ve taken down much larger targets. Jared Taylor is a marginal figure, if not despised, at least suspect. Charles Lindbergh was a god, and the Jews turned him into an unperson in a week’s time after the Dearborn speech. AmRen will be given the Free Republic treatment in short order, adding another few thousand Americans to the list of people whose entire information news intake is vetted by Jews first before consumption.

In addition to the “Jews are White” strategy for the ones who still have the Ferengi phenotype, there are also the ones who really do look like us, and never need to announce their presence, simply lending their assent in group discussions to standpoint that are friendly to Jewish interests. They get us coming and going.
Now, Jews have been strategizing as a Race for three thousand years - for those who doubt this, a rereading of the book of Exodus is in order. Whites have been strategizing as a race - well, it would be more accurate to say Whites did strategize as a Race for about twelve years in the mid 20th century.

12 years experience vs. 3000, with all of those on our side who strategized already tortured, burned, bombed, hung, ethnically cleansed, starved, or sent to the Soviets to be worked to death in labor camps, and their children brainwashed and silenced. So, unlike our Jewish counterparts, we lack that from-the-crib instruction in going for the jugular while feeling not a twinge of compassion in doing what must be done.
I think Taylor’s gamble is laughable because the level of political acumen (not to mention money, media access, etc.) between the two groups are not even remotely comparable.

And, although it did only last twelve years, the other method does seem to have the advantage of, um, working. Even to the point of holding off four Planetary Empires while so doing. The small hope that I have is that just a few years of Internet access has brought the most intense propaganda campaign in history - “The Holocaust” - to within measurable distance of its end. And all this just fifty years after our first slave revolt was put down so definitively! That is indeed heartening.

I do most of my work in what is referred to as “the real world” and I daresay I have ‘converted’ more people to the JQ than most online boards. It is a hard but not impossible road that begins with courage and ends with confidence. People who open Whites’ eyes to the Black ethnic cleansing of our cities, and Mexican depredations of the economy, are of course, wonderful. I simply feel that all of these branches of work must be done without Jews. That group which does not exclude Jews will eventually be ruled by them.

Likewise, there must be groups that openly speak about Jewish power and wrongdoing, expressing the appropriate degree of anger while so doing, and not just dispensing words. If you are afraid of the person you’re accusing, it plays badly with the crowd. Americans, especially, hate a loser.

Comment by wintermute — July 4, 2006 #


• The responses I have seen from JQ’ers are all over the spectrum: shoot them, give them the boot, name the Jew, etc.

Create a climate of opinion that does for them what the climate of opinion does for us: causes self-hatred, limits reproduction, encourages emigration, inspires fear of openly speaking in one’s own ethnic interests for fear of physical reprisal or job loss, etc. Continually feed this climate over decades, until the very sanity of the target group is shaken. This is one advantage we have in comparison to the Jews: much lower levels of neuroticism. They’ll break psychologically very quickly. Look at Michael Weiner. For him, the “Holocaust” is on its way already! And all of this because a few people on the internet have noticed that PNAC and the Iraq war were basically a Jew thing. Ditto Iran. I would say two decades of a “Critique of Jewish Culture” would have them begging for terms.

This process should be brought to a feverish summit where repatriation or sterilization are offered as alternatives for Jews, Muslims, etc.

Blacks and Mexicans: give them the South and Southwest. For the sins of America some form of permanent punishment, which is also a reminder of the terrible costs that externalizing costs and moral cowardice to later generations, that has a permanent effect on White political discourse is needed. New constitution sets death penalty for slavery or any related economic model, including immigration for cheap labor. Nation busting by capitalists will be the occasion for eye-opening reprisals a squeamish public and a cowardly and soft ruling class will never forget.

Intergenerationality is the key word here. We will initiate the project - and must design institutions which remain true to their charters. It is our children’s children who will see this process through to completion.

Comment by wintermute — July 4, 2006 #

Wintermute has captured the probable destiny of AmRen given Jared Taylor’s choices, using the JBS as a template. Wintermute does not underestimate our enemy but criticizes our folly for underestimating them. Jews have not survived and thrived for millennia in hostile environments because they are weak our soft; they are cunning and ruthless. This is not to say we should mimic them in every way since much of their scheming has made them a parasitic race. They can no longer live on their own. They need us while at the same time their malice and paranoia drives them to destroy us. It’s a contradiction buried deep in the Jewish soul.

Here is another piece of background showing the pervasiveness of anti anti-semitism. At Majority Rights, a forum slavishly devoted to making pro-White views “respectable”, there is still a fair amount of discussion about the JQ though it has a few contributors (one especially) who think just like Master Freud would have liked of his goy toys - that anti-semitism is a form of mental illness rather than a very healthy form of self-defense. Wintermute was one of the most eloquent proponents of the importance of a successful resolution to the JQ at MR and for that he was banned for a time from the site along with Friedrich Braun. The pathological jew-worshippers (and I do mean worship) still ply their trade at MR but not the more vocal anti-jews. Nonetheless, MR is still a useful site, as is, to a lesser degree, AmRen.

I suspect MR will follow the lead of AmRen if it ever becomes more of a force in shaping public opinion. It is too costly to defy our real enemy. Chasing their spawn down endless rat holes is more what they want of us. From Wintermute’s comments make special note of the Sierra Club. I remember as a child growing up to the impending doom of the “population explosion”. It permeated public thought, from governmental initiatives (the EPA) to novels like Soylent Green. The theme was mankind is the world’s bane. Pro-environment groups like the Sierra Club were big into this mindset and it is at least partly true; there can be too many people for a given eco-system. The funny thing is that once White populations dropped below replacement the constant reminders of population explosion have become fewer and fewer; this even as 3rd World populations continue to boom. Also, instead of being very anti-immigration, as should be expected from any pro-environment group, the Jew-money has neutered the Sierra Club. It no longer speaks for the environment but for Jewry. If there’s a conflict of interest, within a pro-environment organization, between Jewry wanting more Mestizo’s to overrun America and Environmentalists wanting fewer immigrants guess who wins? The same thing is now true for organized labor. They don’t speak for labor’s interests (fewer workers to keep wages high) but in Jewry’s (more darkies to bring down whitey).

There can be no health and life for any being which has surrendered its existence to another. Jews have shown, for so long, such a hostility to our people that we can no longer allow them in our presence – especially not in revolutionary organizations (and White survivalism is now very revolutionary) intended to fight for our interests. It is them or us. Unlike them I hope that they can live on in their homeland or some other place of exile in peace though as far from us as this earth allows. They afford our people no such right to exist. That is their wont. We do not have to be eaten from within by the same hate, just the love to live.

The Delusions of Wordism

Wordism is a term used by Bob Whitaker to describe groups primarily organized by ideology. It is the bane of the White Race. It pits Republicans against Democrats, conservatives against liberals, communists against capitalists, etc. His idea, which I think is obvious after one is exposed to it, is that Whites are killing themselves with words; words that are often important but secondary to our survival. David Duke recently made a speech of a similar vein. Other races are not now primarily organized by words but by blood. This is our great comparative disadvantage.

A classic example of the futility of wordism is the limp-wristed opposition paleo-conservatism provides neo-conservatism. Neo-conservatism is a more moderate flavor of liberalism than hardcore or moderate leftism. Paleo-conservatism is a more moderate flavor of neo-conservatism. They are all word fetishists. Go to Chronicles Magazine and read the comments to get a sample of this. Outstanding comments and thought provoking, but almost none sullied with the reality of blood. These are among the most well educated commentators in the paleo-con world. Until the core of paleo-conservatism abandons its primarily ideological orientation, it is purely reactionary – that is taking the scraps the Establishment gives them and trying to turn it into something. These scraps aren’t fit for dogs much less free men. Reaction is not a strategy for victory, action is. Until they rally to the explicit call of the White Race and say so they should continue to flounder in obscurity.

Team America is a political action committee that is what I would consider classic paleo-con. It is headed by Bay Buchanan, Pat's sister, and I have a lot of respect for what they are trying to do. They are trying to stop the immigration insanity currently going on, in particular the amnesty scheme, and are trying to oust a few of the more notable open borders advocates (i.e. Establishment Lackeys) in Congress. The problem is they have already surrendered the high ground to liberalism; that is they argue about the pros and cons of immigration within the propositional paradigm. I suspect many of the leaders in this organization know of the importance of race but they will not utter it. They constantly run from the label they fear most - Racist. The American Conservative, a paleo-con magazine, recently editorialized of the necessity of distancing the immigration reform movement from white nationalism. In other words they will try to out-liberal the liberals regarding which proposition is the most American while they hypocritically condemn neo-cons for doing likewise in certain other moral domains (like fag rights and imperialism).

The "king of open borders", Chris Cannon recently won the Republican primary for his seat in Congress. Team America put a lot of effort into beating him. Part of me wanted Cannon defeated but another part realized that we haven't awakened yet. Until our side is willing to say we are the White Race and we (blood, faith, culture) are worth defending we don't deserve to win since we will be winning due to sophistry and playing by the enemy's rules.

All this is not to say ideology is not important. It is, very much. The problem is we are facing an attack clearly intended to wipe us off the face of the earth and this must be addressed first. The defense of our race has to be a given amongst the intellectual leadership of our people. They must sunder themselves from the distorting influence which emits a narcotic fog throughout our people. After that ideas can be sorted out.

What is this thing called Judeo-Christianity?

About a year ago was when I was first exposed to this movement called Kinism one of the things many of the Kinist bloggers talked about a lot was Judeo-Christianity. Up to that point I had a positive view of it, having uncritically accepted the notion that our culture and even religion were Judeo-Christian at their foundations. After all, every conservative opinion medium that was easily accessible sang the praises of our Judeo-Christian heritage. Could they all be wrong? It didn’t take long for me to see and agree with what the Kinists were saying about the ‘virtues’ of this amalgamation. Since I was already well aware that something was seriously wrong with the conservative political movement it should come as no surprise that that which was (and still is) its largest supporter was also diseased. I used to reflexively defend the Religious Right since they were opposed to much of the progressive ideals of liberalism, at least in word. I was thinking the thoughts the Establishment expected from those in the antithetical sphere of its dialectic charade. Liberals boldly propose new schemes, conservatives counter-propose something more palatable, and the masses ultimately receive a synthesis of the two.

There was a time when I thought the conservative variety of Christianity really was in opposition to this spiral of progress. It is not since it truly is JUDEO-christian. The oft-used moniker Judeo-xtian fits even better. When you look at the current state of the West today, and more importantly the White Race, you will see, if you are unafraid of the truth, that the institutional church is not only not working against our demise but has possibly become its most energetic cheerleader. Why is this, and what the heck IS Judeo-Christianity?

There are a few characteristics of it that I think are generally true. Within the following very important subjects Judeo-Christianity has made its position very clear. I consider the contemporary conservative/evangelical church and its many political organizations to be the soldiers making up the army known as Judeo-Christianity. These include such church groups as the Southern Baptist Convention, the Presbyterian Church of America and the more conservative varieties of the mainline Protestant and RC churches; such organizations as Focus on the Family and Campus Crusade for Christ; and such public figures as James Dobson, Pat Robertson, Jerry Fallwell, and Tim LaHaye; and such publications as World Magazine. What is the faith that binds them and motivates them? Judeo-Christianity.

Here are some of the key characteristics of it:

God’s Chosen People. Judeo-Christians first and foremost acknowledge that God’s Chosen are not those who He has elected from the beginning of time to share eternity with him but are those who claim to be the blood descendants of the Hebrews – modern day Jews. Modern day Jews, be they Orthodox, Reformed, Liberal, or as Atheistic as Madeline Murray O’Hare, have Judeo-Christians wrapped around their fingers. Judeo-Christians think God will curse those who oppose followers of the Talmud; a book exclusively for Jewry which claims God’s Son is boiling in excrement. If ever a group has been characterized by members who have committed the unpardonable sin – blaspheming the Holy Ghost – it is Jewry. Yet Judeo-Christians not only do not oppose Jewry, they think they walk on water. They even take them as their primary identity – Judeo. Authentic Christianity acknowledges that God’s Chosen people are the Elect; those He has chosen to save from damnation by his sovereign, and to us mysterious, will, through the sacrifice of his son.

Dominion. The Bible is clear that all is God’s and he expects his chosen people to take his revelation and apply it in the world. Judeo-Christians think that when Jesus says to render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s, it means everything that Caesar claims is his. This is a cop out which allows Judeo-Christians to seemingly stay relevant to the fickle moods of the world. It is also an act of cowardice since Christians no longer have confront evil but can virtuously (in their own minds) surrender to it. If Caesar chooses to conscript your children into a war for imperialism Judeo-Christians will cower and say “Caesar calls” so we must render unto him. Authentic Christianity understands that since all is God’s then “that which is Caesar’s” is clear – nothing. Caesar exists to serve God and we are all under his dominion. There is a role for Government and that is to be obedient to God’s revelation and enforce His law. Judeo-Christian’s will deny this surrender of dominion but listen to how they always speak of obeying the ‘law’ – Caesar’s law that is. Good little Judeo-Christian John Ashcroft said he would enforce the law of the land when appointed Attorney General – this ‘law’ being Roe vs. Wade; not even a law based on how law is formulated in the United States much less a law in the mind of God. It is an abomination (like much of the law in the West today) but Judeo-Christians render unto Caesar whatever Caesar says.

Usury. This is a subset of dominion but deserves special mention. The entire pyramid of Western prosperity today is built upon usury – making money off of money. The Bible condemns it repeatedly and the Church did for the first 1500 years of its existence. Around the time of the Reformation, and picking up steam ever since, is the Church’s acceptance of this practice. The Church today is even one of its greatest practitioners through its ‘investments’ as well as its tortured biblical interpretations. It is commonplace to hear the Parable of the Talents used as a defense of usury when it is clear Jesus is condemning it, remaining consistent with his respect for his father’s law. Usury has been and is a destroyer of nations; it reaps where it does not sow, it is avaricious and feeds the beast known as capitalism – a modern antithesis to Marx’s communism. It has helped make the United States an empire that is now the greatest champion of the New World Order. To consider that the United States 150 years ago was probably the most Godly nation on earth and now it is probably the most wicked makes this all the more obvious. Productivity must come from work, real work, not through schemes.

Race. This area more than any other shows the sycophancy of Judeo-Christians to the Establishment. Jewry has schemed and is currently carrying out what can be called nothing other than Genocide of the White Race. This has been going on for a very long time but has accelerated dramatically since the world wars of the early 1900’s. The Church until at least the mid-1800’s was a strong opponent of Jewry in this area and at least a moderate opponent until the 1940’s. Since the 1960’s the Church has been in wholesale retreat and now accepts Jewry’s ‘religion’ as its own. The Evangelical Church threw in the towel once Jewry was able to destroy White people’s solidarity in what is badly labeled as the Civil Rights movement. Anywhere in the West today, if you cross Jewry, you end up marginalized at the least if not ruined. The gutless cowards of Judeo-Christianity have even jumped on the bandwagon and consider ‘racism’, that political weapon Jewry (notably Leon Trotsky) invented and has wielded like an axe, into a sin, maybe even THE sin. Go to any Christian blog and see which attracts more venom from its hosts – blasphemy or ‘racism’. Some of them even consider racism to be blasphemy. These folks are so clueless and craven they have convinced themselves that Jewish ideology intended to undermine White society is from the Bible.


Judeo-Christians know their place; in the religious realm filling the same role which respectable conservatives fill in the political – practical implementers of that which their master’s have granted them. They will take the leftovers of the real debate that the Establishment has already decided and make ‘Christianity’, Judeo-Christianity that is, fit into it. No wonder Kinists are hated by these frauds; we hold up a mirror to their pock-marked faces.

No doubt liberal Christianity is worse in many ways but for how long are we going to continue to accept “less worse” and the continued slide into degeneracy as evidenced by culture, race, and faith? Things are too bad to accept the lesser of two evils anymore. Christianity which is in thrall to Jewry is no Christianity at all.

With all this said, here is an attempt at a concise definition. Judeo-Christianity is a political and religious union which subordinates and perverts Christian (and especially White) interests to Jewish interests.

Amnesty Daze

This is a rambling post, hence the title...

The news of the impending amnesty of millions of illegal aliens should be a surprise to no one who has figured out what America now is. Still, I am a bit dazed - not only by the indifference with which this story is met by the public - but by the sheer brazenness of our eternal enemy. The more our people yield, the more they are expected to yield again. It is one thing to read about the Stockholm syndrome in psychology class, quite another to see it played out at a national level repeatedly.

Yes all our establishment institutions are either controlled by or are obedient to our enemy but when will enough Whites wake up? Awareness didn't come to me without a good deal of searching and in the unfolding period of discovery that followed many things I held dear came crashing down. Is there enough initiative left in enough of our people to rediscover that which we know instinctively though we subordinate it to our egalitarian/nihilistic obedience training? I really don't know.

Another reason for the daze is that I find myself almost in a parallel universe as far as social interaction. The few 'intellectuals' I come in contact with completely buy into the fundamentals of liberalism and what is worse is that they refuse to even entertain any dissent. On Saint Patrick's Day I chatted with someone that the controlled media would call "conservative" or even "right wing". I've known him for quite a few years and before my awakening (started about 2 years back and is on-going) considered an ally on the issues of our day. I told him I'd love to move out of the Washington DC area for a number of reasons, one being the threat of terrorism to the capital of this nation-destroying empire. He responded that he was an "internationalist" and a "free trader". I said free trade is fine as long as labor isn't commoditized in the process. Since the people are the nation labor cannot be freely exchanged if the nation is to survive.

When I added that another motivation was the browning of our area through massive immigration he said immigration is less proportionately now than 100 years ago. When I suggested that there are multiple differences between then and now, notably racial, he had to just end the discussion. It was civil but violated our state religion and this respectable 'conservative' would not dare pollute his mind with such heresy. This is someone who writes for a widely read neocon magazine and newspaper plus books on occasion. Rationally I can see why he would want nothing to do with a discussion on race; for any neocon short of denouncing race, any mention of it that became public could and would force him to look for new employment and new social circles. It is also an affront to their deeply held faith that words trump blood. Intellectually it is craven.

Yet this person is typical of the establishment sycophants. They all refuse to state the obvious or to even investigate it - that race is not only an important issue but that it is THE issue that drives the seeming vagaries of history. It is possible that maybe I am overstating the case here but is it any wonder since it is the great unmentionable? If these participants in the Establishment's adversarial charade (Republicans vs. Democrats, neocons vs. liberals) were honest with each other one side would say to the other as Captain Von Trapp said to the Nazi commissar in The Sound of Music, "we both seem to be suffering from an appalling lack of curiosity".

The other people I come in contact with are fat, dumb, and happy; contented in their processes of seeming self-actualization. Many of these have already committed themselves to their voluntary extinction to atone for the 'sins' of our forefathers as described by our eloquent enemy. Why would they care about the future? I personally come into contact with very few folks who think outside the ideological plantation. The blogosphere is an exception but it is, for now, a ghetto. This virtual world seems the only place where a modicum of sanity and reality exists. Seems paradoxical.

An added point of interest for me that has brought this whole alien invasion home is my current search for work. I finished a consulting engagement in December and have yet to land a new gig since. Being between jobs for a few months is not unheard of and there are many factors involved such as business cycle, luck, fit, etc. Putting aside the conventional answers I have noticed a preponderance of Asian Indians in the consulting marketplace in every part of the chain: both as consultant competitors and as the head-hunters. I have worked with many Indians and have liked almost all of them but when you lose work to them in your own country due to uncontrolled immigration or work visa madness it becomes less abstract and very personal. As more Whites feel this same squeeze maybe then there will be a rejuvenation of our warrior spirit?

When our people see how other races treat us when we are in direct competition only an idiot or a coward would not wake up. One more personal anecdote. I was at Air Force basic training in 1984 (a fitting year). There were 40 men per unit, called a Flight. Of that group there were 35 whites and 5 blacks. Every morning we would assemble in a box formation of 5 by 8 to march to breakfast and later for lunch and dinner. There was an ordering to the formation with the tallest men being in the front and the right and the shortest to the left and rear. It was assumed that each man got into the same spot every time we got into formation (for simplicity) and generally that was the case. When we entered the cafeteria for meals one column went in at a time so there was a rule to rotate the starting column for each subsequent meal. That way each man would sometimes go in early, sometimes in the middle, sometimes late. Sounds fair right? Well guess what 4 of the 5 brothas (to his credit one of them did not) did? They would line up in the column that everyone knew would be first to go in for that meal and displace the whites who were normally in that slot. The brothas must have worked this out by some sort of collusion because they always acted in consort while the whites just passively went along so as not to cause dissension or it could be that most were oblivious. I don't know since we didn't talk about it. I noticed it and it bothered me a bit but I was just a very young adult at the time and I didn't want to make a stink at basic training. You want to keep your mouth shut and just make it through but that experience has made a lasting impression. I was definitely not racially aware at this time and was surprised these blacks didn't have the same concern for fairness that I and all the whites shared.

That story may seem silly but to me it encapsulates in microcosm our current fight for survival - brown folks taking, whites yielding. More white folks need to see the fantasy of equalitarianism dashed to bits by blacks and mestizos kicking sand in their faces. Seeing Mexicans angrily marching in our cities demanding anything is an affront but our people are still too weak due to the political HIV that has weakened us. The mestizos and blacks are just the opportunistic diseases of this immunity system failure.

This amnesty is just another result of that weakness. Will the antibodies kick in or is the patient already terminal? Either way, only the ultimate destruction of the virus will save us else the wave of diseases it invites will wash us away.

A Classic White Separatist Apologetic

Being one of those bloggers who posts in spurts, I still enjoy surfing and reading other's thoughts. Some of the gems that I find are buried deep in discussion threads as opposed to being stand-alone posts. One in particular I came across recently I'll past here in full. It is from MajorityRights dot com. If you've never been there and you are interested in the plight of our people, you should. The site itself is a mixed bag as far as whether I believe it is valuable to the survival of the White Race but generally it is excellent. The host goes by the moniker "Guessedworker" and he is very fair minded and thick skinned. He allows many contributors who are not assets to our cause in my view. One is an IQ-fetishist who could care less about the White Race per se, but rather that the human IQ be maximized whether it be through Asians, Jews, or some mix. Another comes very close to Steve Sailer's "Citizenism"; again wanting to maximize the types of people who provide for a productive society irrespective of whether they are White or not. All the rest of the members, those who make the initial postings, are what I would consider White Nationalists of various stripes.

Now the post that follows is from one of the contributors who was responding within someone else's thread titled "Black Aggression". Here is the link:
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/black_aggression/#comments.

JW Holliday's retort was to an anti-racist (i.e. an anti-White racist) labelled June Gordon (better named Jewn Gordon) who trolls there on occasion. It is a classic that should be, or at least something very close to it, a part of our apologetic arsenal. Here it is in italics:


If I may paraphrase an argument that Svigor often uses:-

Why do people like “June Gordon”, Tim Wise, the GNXPers, all non-white “Americans”, white liberals, Jews, etc. so very much want to live in the same nation as us “dumber-than-Asians, more-criminal-than-blacks, less-noble-than-Jews, less-hardworking-than-Hispanics, criminal white gentile Americans?”

If all we want is to be separate, then why can’t we have an amicable separation. Each side can have a good-sized, ecologically viable, pleasant and productive territory. We can have - with full freedom of speech and no media monopolization - a honest public discussion of the merits of homogeneity vs. diversity for each population group, and then give members of each group a choice between a homogenous national state, or the multiracial, diverse rump America.

Forget about the details for the moment, let us keep the issue crystal clear. Let us focus on the principle of the matter.

Why must these folks force us to live in the same nation as them? Assuming that everyone has free choice, and everyone has the option of a ecologically sound, pleasant state, then what’s the problem? Do they really love us so much, that they cannot live apart from us? What’s the fascination with living amongst us stupid, violent white gentile, racist Americans? You’d think that given how much blacks complain about white racism, that they’d be begging us to leave them be. Yet, it’s the other way around, white flight tries to flee from “people of color”, and the “people of color” keep on following the whites. No matter how much whites want to be separate (in practice, if not overtly), they are forced to be integrated.

Isn’t it pathological to want to live amongst people who you believe hate you and wish to do you harm? A large fraction of blacks think that whites intentionally infect their community with diseases, flood their community with drugs, discriminate against them, flooded the levees in New Orleans, etc. If that is the case, and whites are so viciously racist, then, why don’t blacks and others demand to be as far away from us as possible?

After all, if blacks really are as capable as whites, and if the only thing holding them back is white racism and the legacy of that racism in history, then, by golly, all they need to do is be separate from whites and they’ll build their all-black community into a “shining city on a hill.”

Why don’t racial liberals wish to help blacks be free of the racist white parasites tormenting these intelligent, peaceful, and noble men and women of color?

The rallying cry of the racial liberal should be: “freedom and self-determination for people of color! Get as far away from the racist white devil as possible.”

Or do they believe that without a white majority, any rump America would become Detroit or New Orleans?

And they believe that, given all the facts, and given free choice, the “white devils” will run away from the people they are allegedly tormenting as quickly as possible?
Posted by JW Holliday on Wednesday, February 22, 2006 at 12:15 AM | #


Since most White Nationalists are better described as separatists than supremacists (the distinction of which is worthy of its own post) JW's logic pins our enemies completely. They have no retort other than their typical obfuscation or straw-man arguments. Why are we constantly being called evil and deemed worthy of genocide by our jewish dominated establishment when we are simply trying to live in peace in our own lands? Simply because the elite have deemed it necessary for progress (Liberals), profits (the rich gentiles), and supposed peace (Jewry). They all agree on the end state though their motivations vary between idealism, greed, and malice.

When the majority of Whites finally see and agree that we have a right to be LEFT ALONE if we chose, the current stagnant political situation could change and fast.

Let us hope and work in whatever ways we can to bring that about. Bravo JW.

Sale of the Century

There is an old saying that you should be careful of what you wish for because you may actually get it. The Twentieth Century had many things which distinguished it, most notably change and death, and threaded throughout its salient moments was something which I believe will become clearer and clearer as more time passes. Amongst all the other events this may have been the most pivotal. And, what was this? It was the currying of favor by the White Nations, of a small but very influential group, to give them an edge in their competition against other White Nations. Once this group was bought, the winners of the auction ‘won’ their conflicts but in so doing they sold their souls, and are right now in their death throes because of the bargain. I call it the sale of the century but it may have been the swindle of the ages.

At the beginning of the 20th Century, the White Race was ascendant, though undoubtedly by some very questionable means. Over 30% of the world’s population was white and the chasm of technology between the white world and non-white world was immense. Any conflict between the two was virtually a foregone conclusion. Just about all the land of the world was directly under the authority of white governments. Whites knew who they were and what it took to protect themselves, though often in short-sighted ways. What was generally in contention was the power distribution within the white world.

This competition was the genesis of our current death spiral for it did two things: first it made the major white nations desirous of empire to maintain parity with whoever was the greatest at the time; second it caused the white nations to look for anything from which to gain an edge. Imperialism made us an affront to the many peoples of the world who were not keen on being subjects of foreigners, it transferred enormous wealth and knowledge to them, allowing them to grow in ways they never could have on their own, and it made our people supremacists since we then had to rule over the brown world and ‘civilize the savage’. Imperialism is unhealthy to the master and the serf and it destroys diversity and localism.

The search for an edge caused white nations to lose sight of what got them to where they were - their genetic endowment, the order which issues from it, and the resultant culture. Since they now had to win at all costs against fellow Whites every little bit helped. Within most white nations were a particular people with well known talents in certain areas: very well motivated, cunning, eloquent, and powerful. Over the centuries this nation within nations honed the skills necessary for their survival in areas deemed inappropriate, immoral, and/or illegal for Whites. Since earlier white rulers saw the danger of this nation, they segregated them into certain areas and limited them to certain activities. In spite of or because of this they got stronger. By the start of the century they dominated the international trade in money (banking) as well as information dissemination (the media). This group has both thrived within and despised its hosts at the same time. The earlier wisdom of our leaders in keeping them on a very short leash was about to be abandoned.

Their first attempt to use their power was during a conflict between a white, Christian nation – Russia, which lorded over a multi-racial empire - and one of the first non-white countries to have a chance at resistance – Japan, which was a completely homogeneous nation. The Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05 showed the weakness of the Russian Empire and the strength of the Japanese for sure. It also showed where the Other’s loyalties and enmities lay. The richest money changer in the USA (Jacob Schiff) provided enormous capital to Japan. Also, the Others fomented revolution in Russia in 1905. Russia may have lost anyway but the Others contributed greatly to this outcome. Russia’s revealed weakness enhanced both Germany’s ambitions in Europe as well as further Japanese expansion in the East, both of which had profound implications later in the century.

At this point in history, the Others were dominant in Germany. Their ideological movements were gaining momentum under the façade of progress and reason, when these movements were and are neither. Anthropology (Franz Boas), Psychology (Sigmund Freud), Sociology (Max Horkheimer), and other fields of study were all in their early stages of corruption: to serve the Others political purposes. Popular institutions such as entertainment and news were also under their influence, if not control, as well as the fountain of capitalist/industrialist economics: money. Their primary base of operations was initially Germany though later it was to become the USA.

With the defeat of Russia it became clear to the white nations that these Others were an important ally to gain, in their various quests for empire. In the buildup to the Great War, this was most apparent. The biggest enemy of the Others was still Russia, with her White Christian Tsar who still treated the Others the way White Christian leaders had in the past – as seditious foreigners. They were about to put him and all of his people under their wrath. As the powers of Europe schemed on how to deal with the upcoming international conflict, the Others initiated activity for the annihilation of the White Race, or so it appears in hindsight. The Others were very pro-German in the beginning of the war and maybe would have stayed so if the first part of their plan had not worked – a takeover of Russia. Their revolution in Russia, again in the midst of the war (just as in 1905), this time worked. They were able to convince the poor Christian peasants and workers that it was a proletariat revolution when its advocates were the quintessential bourgeoisie. The Others ‘capitalist’ money even paid for this anti-capitalist (supposedly) revolution. The Others paid with their wealth gained from milking the working man dry and only asked that this working man contribute with his own life. When the Others murdered the Tsar and his family a metaphor for the whole century was set – the death of Whites at the hand or by the cunning word of the Others. Once Russia was toppled and the Other’s greatest enemy became their greatest friend, now what was in their best interests? If one were to suspect a latent loyalty to Germany for being their most gracious hosts was to sustain them think again. The auction was to begin.

No one even proposes that they couldn’t be bought. That was a given since it has characterized them throughout history and is part of the reason they are almost universally reviled, even when they control virtually every organ of public opinion. The question wasn’t whether they could be bought but who would come up with the sweetest offer. Once their affections were obtained their ‘services’ would be rendered. In 1916 and 1917 as Russia plummeted, Germany and Britain began a vigorous courtship of her ‘ladyship’. A new homeland was the centerpiece of any deal. Kicked out of wherever they had dwelled in the past they now pulled a whopper, even for them. These Others now assumed the identity of a people they normatively had no connection to. Whereas they originated from central Asia, they claimed title to land of people from another race and faith. The Semitic people (descendants of Shem) of the Middle East who still followed the Old Testament are typically what people think of as Jews, when in fact these people are a small minority of ‘Jewry’. The people who asked that the land of the Hebrews be given to them, were Hebrew neither by birth nor adoption. Talmudic Khazars were now the people who were considered Jewry and the Semitic people who lived there (mostly Muslims and Christians) be damned.

Germany’s biggest hurdle in winning Jewry’s favor was her ally, the Ottoman Empire, who though they were Turkish and much closer related by blood to the Khazars than to the Arabs (real Semites) who lived there, were not willing to stir dissension in their empire with such a dramatic rearrangement. Germany was stuck. She could talk about how good she’d been to Jewry and promise to try harder but that wasn’t good enough. Britain wasn’t hamstrung by the Ottomans since they were at war and gladly seized at the opportunity to carve up the empire of an enemy and win the favor of an important power in one blow. The Jew bankers who lived in New York and London were won over and Theodore Herzl’s vision of a new homeland in Palestine became a firm commitment by Britain with the announcement of the Balfour Declaration in 1917. Britain expected repayment and Jewry did not disappoint.

The Jewish media in America went from being pro-German or neutral to joining arms with President Wilson in wanting to make the world safe for democracy. "Death to the Huns" was the new cry. The provocation started, now all that was needed were a few big events to stir American opinion away from isolationism. Even before this, in 1915, the passenger ship the Lusitania was sunk by German submarines but Jewry was still pro-German then so the media didn’t fan the flames of war so much. That this passenger ship was carrying munitions should have made the leaders of Britain and the USA just as culpable for murder as the Germans but such is not the case. The loopy Zimmermann telegram, in early 1917, which was an attempt by Germany to get Mexico to invade the USA, was the final event to grease the skids of war. Probably not coincidentally the British intercepted the telegram and forwarded it to the USA. It was laughably bad diplomacy but certainly not to be taken seriously unless the USA was looking for an excuse to go to war. Either Zimmermann was an idiot, since Mexico could have been conquered by one American division, or he was a double agent. I have not heard that argued but I find it hard to believe he was so dumb. Either way, Wilson and the British and Jewry got their way, and the US Congress declared war in April 1917.

If this had not happened, the German offensive of 1918, which started very strongly, may have ended the war in a German victory. The French and Brits were spent but right at that critical point the Americans came with fresh troops and supplies. The Allied counter offensive broke the spirit of the German Army, especially when coupled with internal dissension egged on by you guessed it, Jewry. Germany, Jewry’s greatest friend in the world was stabbed in the back. The unprecedented Treaty of Versailles was a fitting epitaph to the awful war, since it planted the seeds for the next one.

In the aftermath of the Great War the next phase of the Sale of the Century begins. Jewry was in ascension but still in an intermediate position. The White Goyim were still too strong. The Soviet Union became Jewry personified. It was their creation from top to bottom, with a handful of useful idiots like Lenin (his own term by the way) who was only half-Jew to make the movement seem less kosher. Millions of White Gentiles to impoverish, brainwash, torture, and kill; thought crimes to institute, even the death penalty for ‘anti-semitism’. How can one be anti-semitic to a Khazar? Who needs to wait for a messiah when there was the Soviet Union?

On the other hand, the Brits did promise a homeland. This was the Jewish dilemma Churchill wrote about in his essay about Zionism and Bolshevism struggling for the loyalties of Jewry. Unfortunately Churchill wanted to win the Jews to his side by hoping that Zionism would be their true love instead of Bolshevism. What he failed to see is that the Jews could, at that time, still love both. Churchill had created a false dichotomy.

Given the treachery against Germany, the onerous ‘peace’ treaty, and the worldwide economic depression, the rise of Nazism shouldn’t be too surprising. Its rise and its casting down of the ruinous ‘culture’ of the decadent bourgeois Weimar Republic created a new bogeyman for Jewry. It had been part of a political trinity of Jewry; the Soviet Union was Jewry at thought, the United States was Jewry at ‘work’, the Weimar Republic was Jewry at play. They were not too happy that the German people rose up against them. The Jews, for the first time in a long time were getting a taste of their own medicine. While millions of Ukrainians were starving to death at the hands of Jewish Bolshevism in the Soviet Union, the fact that Germans passed some restrictions on their own Jews was worthy of a declaration of war by international Jewry (centered in New York) against Germany in 1933. Ukrainians can starve by the millions, at Jew hands, but there better not be one Jew denied a civil service position in a nation that had just faced one of the greatest betrayals in history. Even though Germany was struggling to right herself economically Jews wanted her starved. They initiated a worldwide economic boycott of German goods through their control of markets and demonization of the German people through all their propaganda channels.

That was maybe the only time in the 20th Century when Jewry turned the thumb screws and the Goyim didn’t give in but instead fought back. Germany didn’t become less anti-Jewish as Jewry expected but more so. The Nuremberg Laws passed in 1935 but even they didn’t contain the death penalty for anti-whiteism the way Jewry’s Soviet Union killed their dissenters for thought crimes against the real Master Race.

Jewry was now swinging between the Soviet Union and Anglo-America as served its interests. Germany was rising again and trying to reclaim much that was lost because of the treason in the Great War; even going further as in the absorption of Austria and Czechoslovakia. Danzig had been Germany’s and kept her territory in East Prussia from being joined with the rest. Poland did not give in since she had a commitment from both Britain and France, themselves undergirded by warmongering Jewry, to defend her. Great Britain and France started the Second World War when Germany invaded Poland. Jewry had won again; Millions more of the Goyim were to die. Out of the scores of millions killed during this useless war, all that we are expected to remember now are the couple million (possibly) Jews who died and this situation is even copyrighted – THE Holocaust. EVERYTHING in our history is subordinate to it and them. To even question how many were killed and how is a crime in much of the ‘free’ West today. Jews were instrumental in the creation of the Atom Bomb though they (Oppenheimer, Teller, etc.) were disappointed when Germany surrendered before it could be dropped on her cities. They were further disappointed when it was dropped on the Japanese since they did not want it either to hurt the Japanese or help the Americans, only to punish uppity Germany.

With Germany defeated the next phase of the sale begins. Now the international struggle revolved around the Soviet Union vs. the USA, probably the two most philo-semitic (Jewish friendly) countries in the world. Of course they were both empires, for to be anything else is incompatible with Jewry’s schemes for white nations. Given the freedoms enjoyed in the USA most of Jewry could maintain their dual ‘loyalties’ when they lived in the USA. Some, like the Rosenbergs, went too far even for the weak and simple Goyim. Most were smart enough to stand on, but not cross the line. They helped ‘interpret’ most of our modern law so they certainly know how to use it. The change in this situation occurred as the result of the conflict between Israel and the Arabs. The USA became Israel’s chief benefactor, inheriting the mantle from the UK (since she was spent fighting for Jewry in two world wars), after WWII, and the Soviets naturally aligned with Israel’s foes. With Jews becoming more effective at making the USA a new Weimar Republic and the Soviets aligning with the Arabs the Jews told Stalin to take a hike. Not surprisingly Stalin didn’t like this too much so the Soviet Union started to do things that were ‘anti-semitic’; such as removing the death penalty for anti-semitism. Oh the horrors. But in ‘winning’ this latest round of bidding, the American political process was ruined, for when many of the Jews, like Irving Kristol, turned from Stalin they all of a sudden became ‘conservatives’ – neo-conservative that is. Jews had long been dominant in the USA’s ‘leftist’ political party, the Democrats, (being darlings since at least Wilson and forward) and now they started the takeover of the ‘rightist’ party, the Republicans. In the span of a generation they turned both political parties into anti-white organizations, already having poisoned the popular culture and educational system. There is in USA, as in all the white world, no voice for us in the established order. We Whites are now outsiders in our own lands.

The current jew schemes center around destroying the White Race with the end state seemingly being the New World Order (the implementation of a worldwide managerial state with the Chosen Ones as those managers). Open borders, socialism, egalitarianism, pathologizing whiteness through all mainstream media outlets, civil rights, feminism, faggotry, war-mongering, imperialism are supported by all our jew-dominated institutions. These are the fruits of Jewry. A few American patriots in the 20th Century like Henry Ford and Charles Lindbergh saw this and warned our people but there were too many race traitors and toadies around to stem the tide. Now there are no patriots in the public sphere. They have been purged as though the 1st Amendment were meaningless, which it essentially is. Many white people who have awakened to the threat to our people want to win the latest phase in this perpetual auction but IT is the one thing we should pay NOT to take. With their right hand they will ‘help’ us even as they grasp a dagger in their left. History shows that when we win their favor we lose. It is poisonous and we must anathematize it and those who serve it if we wish for ourselves and other free peoples to survive.

The White Race is now spiraling towards oblivion, not only in numbers but, even worse, in attitude and Jewry loves this. Its public mouthpieces can barely contain either their elation at our continued slide, nor their fury when any (even two little girls) defy them. This will not change as long as we continue to subordinate ourselves to this ruthless, crafty, and hostile foreign race.

How to cleave ourselves from them can eventually be resolved once enough of us realize that it must be done. To say these things makes one a heretic to our state religion and few are yet willing to face the Inquisition.

Wherever You Turn

Before pitching it in our fireplace, to at least do some good, I made a note of an interesting snippet out of the Wall Street Journal. A realtor from Arkansas forwarded some property listings along with some other material praising that region as a great place to live. The photocopy of the WSJ article (written by Jeff Opdyke) had many nice things to say about the area and then it lowered the boom – THERE IS NOT ENOUGH DIVERSITY IN THE REGION. Translation – “There are too many Whites around. What must be done to solve this problem?” It cited a statistic that ‘only’ 1.9% of the population is non-white. I know things are crazy regarding multiculturalism and the anti-white hatred that masquerades as anti-racism. I further know that the WSJ is pure neocon (Jews who used to be Marxist until the US out-bid Stalin for their support), money-worshipping rag, but what the hell does lack of “diversity” have to do with an article on real estate? For any sane person isn’t the opposite true; that the LESS diverse an area is the better?

Is everything now being done in code? Was the article’s backhand against Whites really the only PC way to get the news across? ‘Wink, wink, “We know we shouldn’t be saying this but there are very few colored peoples in this area but we can only say it by making it sound like a bad thing”, giggle’. Doubtful, since the WSJ wants to demonize whiteness the same way all organized Jewry does. Orthodox/Reformed/Atheist, Left/Right, Republican/Democratic; they all agree on that. They would have only said the lack of ‘diversity’ was a bad thing because they meant it. Still, maybe the Goyim aren’t as dumb as we seem and we are using the Chosen People’s propaganda to stay informed, regardless of their sinister intentions. Again, doubtful. The Goyim have largely been beaten down and only see what they are supposed to see and say what they are supposed to say. We seem to have no fight left. That tidbit was there and its brazen inclusion is evidence of our own humiliation and defeat. We must now avert our gaze and accept our disenfranchisement from that which our forefathers built. “Who’re you looking at BOY?” they ask and we look down.

When the assertion was made that the number of Whites was too high and other, preferred, races too low I don’t recall seeing any argument as to why this is a bad thing. As silly as the justifications always are, at least when they are attempted there is some facade of rationality but we are in the age of fundamentalist anti-white hatred. Statements such as these are now just made like mantras – a Rosary for the slaves of the Master Race as we kiss their ring. Is it really now this Pavlovian - this repetition of platitudes without critical reflection? It amazes me the way the average modern looks down at medieval folks as superstitious when we have it over them in spades (pun intended) in that area. We regularly nod our heads in agreement at the most ludicrous, counter-intuitive and surreal declarations of bogus morality and think we are progressive. Bloodletting was less bad for us than Jewry’s philosophies, and was not built on malice.

If white-hating propaganda now shows up during a search for a home, what’s next – the weather report?

Preparing To Take the Plunge

It has been little over 6 months since I came to the conclusion that I had to make a change for myself and family as far as our life model goes. There has, in recent years been a slowly welling realization that something is not right in the prosperity I, and many of my people, are now enjoying. I am currently doing better than ever financially. We have a nice house in the suburbs of Washington DC with a decent plot of land; we have no debt except for our home mortgage; my income has been very respectable for the norms of this region; we lack neither food, nor clothing; we are on friendly terms with our neighbors and belong to a friendly, perfectly respectable church. For all these things, and even more importantly the health and wellness of my wife, children and me, I praise God. This should be enough to make any man a conservative – to want to maintain the status quo, right?

As much as I appreciate what we have, I believe the Lord has spoken to me through his Word (and in turn through many of his prophets here on earth) that our current prosperity is not to his liking. Our children see us “going to Church” on Sunday but living just as the pagans live, with God invisible or in a, very little, box. My children know Dad “goes to work” to pay for our needs and wants. When we need food we “go to the store” and there it is on the shelf. When we need money we “go to the bank”. Life seems not to be something we are experiencing but something we are watching pass us by. No wonder children abandon their parent’s lives; they are devoid of meaning. This whole transformation in my thinking gained great momentum based on my wife’s research on healthy eating. It has led us to look to the Bible for guidance on eating and on living – a guidance that is virtually ignored by the contemporary Church. In parallel with her research on food I continued to delve into socio-economic and political issues and eventually saw the crystal clear truth – that our whole contemporary situation, and much of our history is a sham. The world has been and is about an elite group of people obtaining, maintaining, and growing their wealth, fame, and power at the expense of any who are in their way. I suspect most people would acknowledge this point in the general sense but are unwilling to see the extent to which its truth makes our existence in this model untenable. The thread that was sticking up on a few issues I have pulled on and pulled on until the whole ‘garment’ is a pile of garbage. This whole issue I have touched on in other posts as have many minds greater than mine and though it deserves much greater discussion I will not do so here. I merely wanted to set that as a backdrop for why I, and maybe you, should consider being a new generation of pioneers.

What is the “model” I just referred to, this model that is untenable and we should consider leaving? It is the current Standard American Lifestyle. David, at his blog Covenant Corner recently captured it in a nutshell:

“The home has become a place consisting solely of consumerism. Because no one in the home makes whole goods, the family is made up purely of consumers. Workers go out away from the home to work and gain the financial ability to buy (consume) goods and services. Rather than being a place of industry, artistic expression and production, the home has become a place of idleness, boredom, and often times discontent.”

There is an economy to the world that this lifestyle is mocking; an economy that says you must produce to survive, REALLY produce, not sit at a desk, attend meetings, make loans, litigate, legislate, or otherwise just reshuffle the deck that our betters have created. How many people in America are real producers anymore? They are becoming less and less and as their numbers shrink their yoke is made heavier by the consuming classes who have the faux-power the establishment now shrewdly grants. Many forward thinking and Godly people have expressed this same truth. We Americans are sitting atop a worldwide economic plantation that is exploiting and raping the truly productive here and abroad. Our natural wonders, as well as our own bodies, minds, and spirits are ravaged by the current paradigm. How we (Americans) are still able to stay atop I don’t know yet. I have read bits and pieces that make sense but I have not been able to tie it together yet. But acknowledging that America is now on top of the world should not blind us into thinking that this will last. The world is a very competitive place and there are many well motivated and successful people groups that are rising fast (China and India being notable). Some establishment lackeys continue to blather about a rising tide lifting all boats. I don’t see this as being the case. Why will these competitors want to continue to shine our shoes when they are harder working, smarter, and tougher than we are? They won’t.

Most American farmers are now hirelings to corporate giants like Archer Daniels Midland, Cargill, Monsanto, Tyson, etc. The farmer is the serf producing an undifferentiated commodity that then relies on the ‘value added’ supplements provided by the corporation, be they hormones/steroids, chemicals, economies of scale, ‘efficiency’, seed stock, name recognition, and/or slick ads. The farmer must toe the company line as Massa commands. Massa makes the bucks and pulls the strings; farmer does the work. The situation is just like the movie A Bug’s Life whereby our farmers are the Ants and Massa is the Grasshopper, only our farmers don’t see this – at least most of them don’t. Renegades like Joel Salatin (Polyface Farm), Lynn Miller (Small Farmers Journal), and the folks at Acres USA, to name just a few, are out there but they are greatly outnumbered and outgunned. They emphasize the farmer (or any producer) as free and artisanal, directly dealing with his customer, and cutting out the parasitic and enslaving middle man. Is the tide turning? I don’t know but we can make a difference.

Though, these are by no means exhaustive explanations as to “why” I think leaving the Standard American Life is prudent they are seed-thoughts to motivate the change. If you were to conclude that a change is desirable, maybe even necessary, then what? I have been investigating this for only a few months now so my current thoughts may still change a bit but here’s where I am at right now. This is not ‘advice’, only my germinating plans.

Be Productive. Engage in enterprises where something raw is transformed into something directly usable. There are many options here: food production (crops, orchards, dairy, meats, etc.), animal by-products (leather, wool, etc.), clothing production, wood-crafting, blacksmithing, and many others. If/when things turn down in the macro-economy these skills will be in demand, not only so that we produce for our own families, but also produce things people will really need.

Be Diverse. Enterprises must have symbiosis; that is, multiple activities need to be undertaken that collectively are more productive and efficient, than if they were done alone. For example, beekeeping and orchards are better together than by themselves, since each benefits from the other. Diversity also is more interesting and more adaptable to changing market conditions than specialization, such as only raising beef cows.

Emphasize Sustainability. Building something and emphasizing methods that will last is important in several ways. First, we are being good stewards of the domain God has blessed us with: we are being true to him. Second, we are not negatively impacting our neighbors with externalities (those side effects that others have to pay for due to our sloth or greed): we are being true to our fellow man. Third, sustainability involves pulling our children directly into the production process, as early as makes sense, so that they inherit it and ultimately improve upon it: we are being true to our posterity.

Be Flexible. Whatever I end up doing will initially be based on my best guesses and intuition. Though this may provide a decent starting point, it will no doubt require correction as failures occur and experience is gained. One of things that strikes me about people who live off the land is how adaptable they are, since nature can be cruel and very unpredictable. We must learn to adjust as is required.

Be Communitarian. Just like a diverse operation helps to ensure success, being part of a healthy community does as well. It is the ultimate insurance policy since a good community should be there when catastrophe strikes. We cannot, alone, deal with the worst that may hit us in this fallen world. The virtual insurance, normative today, that has outsourced community to extremely rich and powerful outsiders is a poor (though sometimes needed) substitute. Community not only provides for these practical needs but also provides much of the richness to life and will continue to be rewoven through intermarriage.


With all those concepts in mind where I am currently leaning is towards a home centered on a wood-working enterprise. Preferable is sufficient land with timber to harvest, sustainably, this wood and use it to make furniture and other products for the home, barter, and sale. In addition to this we would free-range chickens, for meat and also raise our own eggs. For milk I would prefer goats though my wife prefers a cow but we’d end up with one or the other. The other things I’d like to do include modest orchards for apples and beekeeping. Pickling will be a must along with other creative types of fermentation to deal with the cycles of natural production. I’m hoping my daughters would eventually develop the skill to make clothing. There are many possibilities, especially for secondary activities.

Lynn Miller emphasizes getting ‘off the grid’ as much as possible. That is, becoming independent of non-sustainable inputs, which come from outside the community and can only be obtained with cash. I believe this is a good objective to strive towards but in the short term I know I would use electricity as well as some petrol. I strive to reduce the amount we use but not elimination; I have too many other things to learn without that as well.

There are still a lot of things to work out but I am aspiring to make a move within the next year or so. Caution and ignorance are being replaced by urgency and knowledge.

If you are contemplating anything similar please let me know your thoughts.

Survival Strategy Thoughts for Whites

As I’ve become more racially conscious as a White man in the past few years I have seen a lot of info showing why we need to wake up. There is so much of it to blow away even the most skeptical field hand on the PC plantation – that is if they are ever exposed to it. Last night I heard on CSPAN another in a long string of outrages: a black leader (a college professor no less) literally called to his audience, with their applauding approval, for the worldwide extermination of all whites. Listen to this White folk – that is the beating heart of blackness in America. Yes, it is asinine but that’s what a very large number of their ‘intellectuals’ say. One has to look for this stuff now – it won’t find you. The mainstream media will not allow it. Once we clearly see there is a problem then what? This is the area where there is a vast desert of nothingness. At least I haven’t found much. What I’m talking about here isn’t advice like, “get the hell out of that ghetto”, or “sue the SPLC”; it’s not that things like that don’t often need to happen but they are band aids. We need a strategy; an overarching set of objectives and a means to get there. The ‘reasonableness’ of these steps must be measured in terms of what is at stake. If something proposed is ‘unreasonable’ but the alternative is our destruction then I say let’s be unreasonable. Here is a brief stab at some of the things I think we need to do. I hope to come across, or maybe even initiate here, more discussion on what needs to be done by White Nationalists and Kinists to try and save our people from genocide. Any other White folk who are willing to act for our people are also welcome even as they seek to make sense of our modern madness. Committed anti-racists need to be made to pay for their ride or sent to the oblivion they so richly deserve.

A couple acronyms I use are CP and CP2. CP stands for the Chosen People. They are disproportionately Jewish but not exclusively so. There are some Jews that oppose this but they are a very small number of influential Jews. Whites who have intermarried with Jews or otherwise been judaized are also included. This is a rich and powerful elite that pulls the strings of the world today. They are advocates for and leaders of the New World Order. CP2 are the Chosen People’s Chosen People. These are the people groups that are now on all the check boxes and preferred lists and are used as the foot soldiers in decimating White Nations around the world. The CP NEVER does its own fighting. Didn’t do it in WWI, WWII or any of the other imperial adventures they initiated - our people did. Our people died at their whim and we have been repaid by a treachery that would shake the world if the dirt craved justice. In the US, the CP2 are most notably Black and Mestizo. In Europe Arabs and Turks are more common. The CP2 the CP uses is dependent on the circumstances.


Militarize our youth. The greatest threat we face is the lobotomization and castration of our children. They are taught not to think, not to love their own, and not to grow up. That way they fail not only to pick up the torch of the generation before them but to be an extended burden on them also. To this point I have tried to raise my own kids with a healthy respect for people of other groups but with almost no education in the differences and how these differences make us incompatible as fellow citizens. Our children, as was I, are way too soft, way too prosperous. All other groups have gangs of brats (young and old) who take what they want and believe the CP propaganda that all their problems are the fault of Whites. When the CP2 don’t get what they want they have tantrums like the children they are in our (to them) alien culture. They do what they have always done: rape, murder, looting, rioting. When this stops they revert to their normative, parasitic indolence. In the future, when they come in their mobs to bring mayhem to our communities (like they recently did in Toledo) we need to respond with overwhelming force, sending them to route. They only respect violence. Charity and mercy on our part is spat upon by them. Our youth must be organized for their own self defense and in defense of their turf. I would hope this type of organization doesn’t take on the flavor of a CP2 gang – hopefully more in line with a Boys Scout-type group that also is schooled in racial awareness and martial arts.

Separate. The more I see of the parasitic relationship between CP2 and us the more I can no longer accept them in general. I accept them as a free and independent people, in their own nations, but not as our burden. This dysfunctional relationship must end; it is killing us as the CP want. In the long term either we must be amalgamated into the disparate races we have allowed into our homelands or separate. In an earlier age with racially restricted immigration assimilation was possible without dramatically altering us. Since the seeds of the anti-racial 1965 Immigration Reform Act have blossomed in force assimilation now equals genocide. Having separate races with dramatically different aptitudes in a socialistic state is untenable for long making the multicultural state a lie. An assimilating melting pot (e pluribus unum) or racial nations are the only options. More and more Whites have agreed to drink the genetic Kool-Aid of miscegenation or sterility. This is essential if the CP's plan is to work.

No longer feed the Beast. Now that the CP run the show, the prosperity our people created is used as bait to attract our own executioners. This Beast only exists because we work for it, pay taxes to it, fight and die for it. It is madness. As best as possible we need to leave it, oppose it, condemn it, shun it. Let the CP who coo lies from their forked tongues hold its festering putrescence up. Then maybe CP2 will start seeing who the real enemy is. We created something to behold and it has been ruined, yet even in its ruination it needs us. It can’t live without us. The CP2 are, normatively, too dumb to see that once we are gone, it will collapse, and along with it the Western ‘prosperity’ it spawns. The CP know this perfectly well. That’s why CP2 are so useful; they do CPs dirty work for them. We MUST find a way to let it die. The only reason we are in such straits is because of our own prosperity. We create prosperity (albeit much of it is ungodly) that attracts the chaff of less successful peoples. MC says they are interchangeable with us and they aren’t. Lash a team of yorkies to a sled and try to win the Iditarod. That's more likely than maintaining a White Country with 3rd Worlders.

Stop imperialism. This is especially problematic with our do-gooder mentality. We want to help the CP2 because they are in such pitiful circumstances by our standards when left to their own. We want to lift them up; make them like us. How noble. We give them shots, teach them our language, our techniques, give them ‘aid’, their populations boom in a Malthusian way, and their squalor is simply reconstituted in cities instead of villages, their violence with gun instead of spear, their garb of robe is replaced with suit. Nothing has changed except the worst of the West (exploitative welfare/warfare capitalism) has replaced their best (simple agrarianism). Our best (our genes) is replaced with their worst (their genes). It’s a lose/lose for everyone except the CP. Third World populations would have never boomed without western imperialism. They can only be maintained with western imperialism. The 3rd World hates us even as they probably realize we are their drug. Without us their population would plummet but they would then have their precious freedom. We have a wolf by the ears – they have a perpetual teat to suckle from. It’s a charade that must be ended soon to bring things more into their natural state.

Return to Work. Of all the actions I list this one is the hardest. The others are really pretty easy. This one takes much more fortitude and creativity. Whites have become fat on top of the world economic plantation. We have to learn to really work again: digging ditches, building our own homes, plowing fields. The days of being overpaid paper pushers in the CPs faux economy are doomed to end one way or the other; better by our own choice than the inevitable collapse. Many Christian Agrarianists nobly pursue this goal while purposely avoiding the other, more ‘racist’, ones. Do they really think this would work in the middle of Zimbabwe? If they do they are fools. Given the artificially high CP2 populations, as White largesse is reduced, CP2 will go after the productive by force. They will be unable to sustain themselves here just like they haven’t in Zimbabwe, as Whites have been killed and driven off. For a season their lusts will be appeased with stealing and murdering from the productive. To them the Goose is only good for a gluttonous feast not for her perpetual golden eggs. The Amish are an admirable people but their pacifism can only work in the context of an otherwise productive society. If they were surrounded by destitution how long would it be before the downtrodden resorted to plunder for survival?

Get Real. The world is, has been, and always will be a dangerous place. Many people groups are only kept from killing outsiders by the constant diligence of the potential victim. This is not to justify imperial aggression but it does justify violent defense. We must constantly remind ourselves that our existence is precarious and can only be maintained with much effort.


I’m sure others have better ideas than this but all I know is something that takes on many of these areas needs to happen and soon.

Bush's Legion

Now that Bush has nominated Harriet Miers as the latest Associate Justice to the Supreme Court, and she is revealed as both a mediocre intellect and a leftist, what does the Conservative Establishment want? To be mollified, to have their wounded egos appeased, to be reminded of how they need to trust El Presidente. It was already clear what Bush was not, a Conservative – at least in the best sense of the label, but it is now also abundantly clear what they are as well - pathetic. Bush’s Amen Corner in the blogosphere is circling the wagons around their guy. They “trust” him you see. Bush assured conservatives that he desired Justices like Scalia and Thomas. Roberts and Miers are to Scalia and Thomas as Tiny Tim is to Tom Jones. It is so patently false, based on the evidence at hand, and clearly reveals Bush for what he is, a puppet of the Liberal Establishment, as to clearly raise the specter of wholesale abandonment by his scorned base. But most (maybe all) the leaders of his base prove, so far, that they primarily crave access to power and the childish desire of being associated with a winner, therefore there will be no wholesale abandonment of the Compassionate Conservative. This could have been, and might still be if the foot soldiers abandon their ‘leaders’, a watershed moment of realignment within American polity. I actually thought the Miers nomination was a good thing because it was Bush unveiled, a hideous corpse with a ghoulish smile, with no adulteration; Skull and Bones in the flesh. This would wake people up. Maybe it will. Maybe a few more marginal partisans are seeing the truth of the betrayal and a critical mass has been reached. If it has it is certainly unseen right now.

Lawrence Auster posted a discussion he had with a pro-Bush blogger who was initially upset but was quickly brought back to the fold by Republican operatives. This loyalist said it was more important to rally around Bush so that the Republicans retained control of the Government. Why - because the Democrats are ‘worse’. Under this model of supposed pragmatism, and it is the model the Republicans have followed for years, the Republicans have to be just a little less worse than the Donkeys. What most don’t see is that these two groups are actors in a grander play, wholly in cooperation at the strategic level, of implementing ‘progress’ in America. Unless we are explicitly ‘ideological’ on some things (for example following the Constitution) we will always be moving to the Left as a society. The Donkey’s part is to initiate progressive ideas in the political sphere; the Elephant’s part is to implement them ‘practically’. The Donkey will typically lose, because most people (White’s at least) don’t want what Leftists call progress, and the Elephant wins because most voters still buy this con. Leftism can’t be beaten by this worthless ‘conservatism’ of the Republicans, which is only watered down liberalism, but by a red-blooded counter-ideology which is just as active on the Right as liberalism is on the Left. For a long time National Review and many others have argued that conservatism is non-ideological, and maybe it is if using Burke and Kirk as examples since in their time there was still a lot to conserve and ideology was a dangerous concept that takes one away from the status quo. Non-ideology doesn’t cut it any more. We have strayed too far from what I would call a state of natural liberty. In my mind natural liberty is best described by a proper functioning of the law as described by Bastiat in his famous essay of the same name.

More and more people seem to be seeing that what is needed is not conservation by yelling “stop” to the march of liberalism but a dramatic, even revolutionary, transformation of where we are. This revolution will happen, though whether peaceful or violent, improving or degrading, is unknown. We live in what is now an Empire and Empire only stays together by coercion. As our imperialistic, debt, and consumerist prosperity continues to fade the ability of the Empire to exert this coercion will weaken unleashing the natural forces it is currently subduing. The geographic entity known as the United States is no longer a nation. We were originally, but to win a war of imperial conquest Lincoln needed to transform “her” into “it”. He started the avalanche and it has only gained mass and speed with time. It can only be made into a nation through several subsequent generations of intensive race-mixing resulting in a new, and normative, genotype. What capabilities this new race will possess, on average, is predictable; somewhere between European, Asian, African, and Mestizo but what that will really mean is a mystery. People are generally opposed to marrying and procreating outside their group in spite of the massive corporate propaganda to the contrary – so this miscegenation must be forced. Churches are already on board, some even saying that racially mixed marriages are better than intra-racial ones. If race mixing occurs as a norm it means the end of the White Race, except as a curiosity in exotic locales, since all White countries are being forced to comply with this same situation. Since the White Race built and maintained the Western World what can be built and maintained when they/we are gone?

However, if revolution occurs and the Empire is cast down AND a worse Empire doesn’t rise in its place (a strong possibility), then there is a chance that real nations can be carved from this Empire. It is doubtful that this transformation would be completely peaceful but considering that the primary looming alternative is a World Government with no rival and complete control over our lives, it is a gamble I hope we are willing to take.

Most people don’t seem to see what I think is becoming crystal clear – the Empire is crumbling. The more it crumbles the more the Establishment will turn to the latent patriotism of Whites to rally to its defense. We are useful for nothing else to the Establishment than to keep their Order intact. Otherwise they want us gone and we soon will be if we can’t defend ourselves.

Not only is Conservatism dead but it should be dead. Bush’s loyalists are blind to what they have become. Seeing the leadership of Evangelical Christianity and the Religious Right go compliantly along with the New World Order raises anew thoughts of End Times in my mind. Who really is the Whore of Babylon? Maybe it won’t be so hard to figure after all.

Going from Miers to the New World Order is a stretch in any short article but one is a herald of the other given that the ‘conservative’ establishment has pinned its hopes on Bush and the Republicans. Miers is one more shiner in a series of brutal beatings to the Religious Right from Bush and Co. and only a co-dependent would stay in the relationship. Much of the right wing grass roots don’t want this but they are not yet ready to see the clear but frightening light.